Class Dispatch to David

From: Liam & Nick

 

February 7, 2024

Below is our dispatch for Wednesday’s class, 2/7/24. It is split into three parts, (1) Notes on Tracy’s presentation, (2) Discussion on the Vignettes we created, and (3) the claims made during our “debate” activity. There are videos of our vignettes from Part 2.</p>
<p>-Liam & Nick
Back to the Dispatch Archive

Notes on Tracy’s presentation on Ecoactivism:

Baz Kershaw

  • Welfare State International (1970s-80s)
    • Locally focused
    • Used puppetry, and large objects (ships, skyscrapers).
      • The landscape became a backdrop
    • Performances that resembled events/festivals more than plays.

Activism’s recombinant formats:

  • Word-based:
    • Poster, placarding
    • Letter-writing
    • Slogans, songs
  • Collective action:
    • Meetings
    • Public rallies
    • Riots
    • Blockades, boycotts
    • Occupations
    • Lobbying, electioneering, pledges campaigns.
  • Creativity
    • Creativity taps into morality
    • Post-humanism
      • Focus on the perspective of the non-human in the Anthropocene
      • Creation of interpretive frame to filter experience.
        • Filters the experience to those who have forgotten.
      • Resource Mobilization
        • Resources could be people/songs, not just materials
      • Condensing symbols & moral shocks
        • If there is not a shock, then the message stagnates.

Recent developments

  • technology/social media
    • Generally considered no more effective than other techniques.

 Examples

  • Salt March in India 1930
    • Protesting the prohibitive tax on Salt by the British government
  • Trail of Dreams 2010
  • The Battle in Seattle 1999
    • Protest activism in conflict with anarchists
  • Virtual Streetcorners 2010
    • Ultra-local; connecting disparate parts of the same city.

The key feature of activism is the taking of space.

  • Enacting a right that is being denied.
  • Using Techniques of Art
    • Greensboro Sit-ins 1960
    • Why Loiter? Campaign, Mumbai 2016
    • Umbrella Revolution, Hong Kong 2014
    • Estonia’s Singing Revolution 1991
      • Built community & a sense of national pride
    • French Farmers 2024
      • Bringing the conflict to the people who may have forgotten about them.

Marine conservationist activism

  • Motif: A hugging a seal
    • Protest: sealing quotas in commercial sealing
  • Using a human body as a stand-in for the post-humanist subject
    • Ex. Bloody seal, bloody whale

Vignettes of Protest

  1. Group 1_Climate Change
  2. Group 2_New Football Stadium
  3. Group 3_Logging Caused Wildfires

Discussion on the Vignette Activity

  • Carpool, difficult to measure its effectiveness
  • Conceivability; the ability to purchase everything
  • Timeline: how long does one have
  • Theory of change
    • “Make like a tree and leaf”: very visible
    • Common pitfall: making a statement, but no outcome
    • Humor invites engagement, guilt shuts people out.
  • Power Mapping
    • Protest’s proximity to power.
  • Points of Intervention
    • Subversion of social norms: transgressive
    • Limitations of playing the public vs direct petition.
    • Put on a lot of different places.
  • Action Star
    • Framing the protest in time, place, and conflict helps draw spectators in.
    • A clear target is necessary.
  • Battle of the Story
    • Foreshadowing what is to come
    • What assumptions are made about the conflict and the desires of the public?

Debate Activity:

Group A: Clicktivism will save the world

  • Reduce the cost of protest
  • Decentralizes ecoactivism
    • The local is now international
  • Gives access to news when people only have access to social media
  • Makes the common person the reporters
    streamlines the protest process & removes barriers to entry.
  • Ex. BLM, Arab Spring
  • Critiques:
    • Social media is not taking away resources
  • “Mouse in hand, power at your fingertips”
  • When people are not allowed to be in person, the internet allows for protest.

Group B: The Revolution will not be on the internet

  • Access to internet
  • Things can only happen on a global scale
  • Grassroots protests are not effective
    • “Joe Biden does not see your tweets”
  • Face to face is more impactful than the anonymity of the internet.
  • Internet activism exists for its own sake
    • Virtue signaling.
    • The internet does not lead to actual change
  • Social media is a tool for in-person activism
  • Social media inconveniences no one.
    Back to the Dispatch Archive